Offshore Energy
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Offshore Energy logo

Your trusted source for global offshore energy news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
Network
  • Offshore Energy
  • Offshore Wind
  • NavalToday
  • Dredging Today
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report your news
  • Privacy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Clean Fuel›AGL Energy’s Crib Point LNG project blocked by the Australian government
Clean Fuel

March 30, 2021 · about 5 years ago

AGL Energy’s Crib Point LNG project blocked by the Australian government

Victorian government has rejected AGL Energy’s proposal for a floating LNG import terminal at Crib Point, citing unacceptable environmental effects as the reason.

1 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email
AGL Energy's Crib Point LNG project blocked by Australian government
Courtesy of AGL Energy

Victorian government has rejected AGL Energy’s proposal for a floating LNG import terminal at Crib Point, citing unacceptable environmental effects as the reason.

The Crib Point Gas Import Jetty and Crib Point-Pakenham Gas Pipeline $250 million project proposal, planned since 2018, faced opposition in the form of the environmental effects statements (ESS). The EES was exhibited for public comment between July and August 2020.

Related Articles

Clean Fuel

AGL submits final bid for Crib Point LNG import terminal

2 min read

In July 2020, Victoria’s planning minister Richard Wynne appointed an inquiry and advisory committee (IAC) to consider the project’s EES. Planning Panels Victoria registered 6,058 submissions and the IAC held a public hearing from October to December 2020.

Following IAC’s report, EES documentation, and other material including submissions and documents tabled at the hearing, the minister assessed that the project will have unacceptable environmental effects.

The assessment states that marine discharges from the proposed floating storage and regasification unit (FSRU) will result in ongoing damage to the environment over the 20-year life of the project.

Reach the Offshore Energy industry in one go!

Offshore Energy is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Offshore Energy on:

Filed under

Clean FuelLNGInfrastructureStorage

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1$50 billion South Korean investment pushes stalled Alaska LNG project closer to construction
  2. 2TGS on 3D imaging mission to unlock new insights into Malaysia's offshore discovery
  3. 3Petrobras strikes another oil-bearing zone in Equatorial Margin frontier
  4. 4MidOcean gets hold of $4 billion in major capital raise to fuel global LNG push

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free