Offshore Energy
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
  • More news
JobsNewsletter
Offshore Energy logo

Your trusted source for global offshore energy news, part of the Navingo network.

Topics
  • Fossil Energy
  • Subsea
  • Alternative Fuels
  • Hydrogen
  • Marine Energy
Network
  • Offshore Energy
  • Offshore Wind
  • NavalToday
  • Dredging Today
Company
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Jobs
  • Report your news
  • Privacy

© 2026 Navingo. All rights reserved.

Home›Green Marine›Panama Canal Opposes GUPC’s Cost Overrun Claim
Green Marine

January 12, 2017 · about 9 years ago

Panama Canal Opposes GUPC’s Cost Overrun Claim

The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) has dismissed claims by GUPC, a consortium that constructed the Expanded Panama Canal, related to cost overruns in the expansion of the waterway. The ACP said it opposes the admissibility of new claims submitted by the consortium, with several of them leading to arbi

1 minutes read
  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Email

The Panama Canal Authority (ACP) has dismissed claims by GUPC, a consortium that constructed the Expanded Panama Canal, related to cost overruns in the expansion of the waterway.

The ACP said it opposes the admissibility of new claims submitted by the consortium, with several of them leading to arbitration and not complying with the dispute resolution procedure established in the contract.

Grupo Unidos por el Canal (GUPC), comprised of Spain’s Sacyr, Italy’s Salini – Impregilo, Belgium’s Jan De Nul and Panama’s Constructora Urban, SA (CUSA), was awarded the USD 3.2 billion project to expand the canal in 2009.

However, the amount that GUPC presented upon the completion of the works was higher than initially projected.

On December 19, 2016, the ACP received two new requests for arbitration filed by GUPC before the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and these claims have already been submitted directly to arbitration.

As a result of these requests, the total amount claimed by the consortium increased from USD 3.28 to USD 5.67 billion.

Most of the claims included in the arbitration requests were already in the pre-arbitration instances and several have not been resolved by the Dispute Resolution Board (DAB), according to the ACP.

The DAB was formed to hear disputes arising between the ACP and the contractor.

World Maritime News Staff

Reach the Offshore Energy industry in one go!

Offshore Energy is read by thousands of professionals every day.

Increase your visibility with banners, tell your story with a branded article, and showcase your expertise with a full-page company profile in our business directory.

CONTACT

Follow Offshore Energy on:

Filed under

Green MarineBusiness & Finance

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Trending Now

  1. 1After Fugro, TDI-Brooks selected for surveys offshore Timor-Leste
  2. 2Vessel duo's APAC drilling support jobs boost Solstad's backlog by up to $30 million
  3. 3New BP deal deepens Aker Solutions’ North Sea footprint
  4. 4Wales’ national marine energy test center secures Crown Estate investment

Daily Offshore Energy News in Your Mailbox

Join thousands of industry professionals who start their day with our newsletter.

Subscribe free