Saipem-Subsea 7 merger would create the fourth-largest oilfield service firm, Rystad says
Reports emerged last week of a potential merger between UK’s Subsea 7 and Italy’s Saipem, saying that a combination of the two could rank as one of the European oil services industry’s biggest-ever deals. Norway’s Rystad said the deal would create the fourth-largest oilfield service company.
Bloomberg said last Thursday that Saipem was looking to combine with Subsea 7 to bulk up and weather an industry downturn.
Commenting on unconfirmed reports that leading offshore contractors Saipem and Subsea 7 are considering a merger, Audun Martinsen, head of oilfield service research at Rystad Energy, said: “Subsea 7 made an unsuccessful bid to merge with US rival McDermott last year. Now it could be looking at a tie-up with Italy’s Saipem, both of which have a strong standing within the so-called SURF segment – involving the construction and installation of subsea umbilicals, risers and flowlines.”
Martinsen added: “A deal would create a truly global oilfield service giant with over $12.4 billion in revenue. The combined entity would have the world’s largest fleet of subsea installation vessels and be the largest provider of SURF services, with a market share of close to 40%. In addition, Saipem has a diverse portfolio including large-diameter pipeline installation vessels, offshore drilling rigs, one of the world’s biggest crane vessels and numerous offshore fabrication yards.”
Such a merger would create the fourth-largest oilfield service company, after Schlumberger, Halliburton, and Baker Hughes, Rystad said.
Rystad Energy, the independent energy research and consulting firm headquartered in Norway, sees this move as a direct response to recent developments on several fronts in the OFS industry.
“We are seeing clear signs of consolidation, diversification and alliance formation in the sector. Oilfield service companies are looking to strengthen their market share in core markets but also develop new lines of business. Both Saipem and Subsea 7 have stated goals of de-carbonization in order to become greener energy service companies,” Martinsen remarked.
According to Rystad, by combining with Saipem, Subsea 7 would also get exposure to onshore engineering and construction, where Saipem has a solid track record in the petrochemical and liquefied natural gas industries, thus reducing dependence on upstream oil and gas activities. Furthermore, Saipem has a legacy name in the Middle East and many contracts in this booming market. With this move, the merged entity could fight McDermott for the leading role in the oilfield services segment in the region.
A potential merger could also have ramifications for the ways in which OFS companies and exploration and production companies structure subsea contracts. If this merger comes to fruition, all top five SURF suppliers will have effectively entered into a major alliance covering subsea work.
“Rival contractor TechnipFMC is having great success with the integrated subsea model, which combines subsea production systems and subsea installation,” Martinsen said.
He added: “The integrated contracts offering has pushed more risk over to the suppliers during the downturn, and has been a success story for E&P companies thus far, but the tables may turn now that the subsea industry is facing a rising tide of new projects. With only a few key suppliers to choose from in the market, have the E&Ps painted themselves into a corner? They may be hoping at this stage that anti-trust regulators step in and prevent further mergers in the subsea segment.”
Spotted a typo? Have something more to add to the story? Maybe a nice photo? Contact our editorial team via email.
Also, if you’re interested in showcasing your company, product or technology on Offshore Energy Today, please contact us via our advertising form where you can also see our media kit.