Deepwater Horizon oil spill caused permanent damage to Gulf shore’s marshes, study says
- Exploration & Production
A new Duke University-led analysis of 270 miles of the Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama coasts has concluded that the Deepwater Horizon oil spill six years ago caused widespread marsh erosion that may be permanent in some places.
On April 20, 2010, an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon offshore oil rig killed 11 workers and pumped more than 100 million gallons of crude oil into the northern Gulf of Mexico, making it the worst environmental disaster of its kind in the U.S. history.
The study named Thresholds in Marsh Resilience to the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill was published on Tuesday, September 27, 2016, in the Nature Scientific Reports journal.
Scientists from the Duke University said that at the hardest-hit of 103 Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) sites, where oil covered more than 90 percent of plants’ stems, widespread die-off of grasses at the marsh edge occurred, followed by up to two years of accelerated erosion as dying plant roots lost their grip on marsh soil.
Erosion rates at these heavily oiled sites were between 1.4 and 1.6 meters per year higher than scientists had expected, based on findings from similar areas that weren’t hit with oil, the research showed.
Brian R. Silliman, Rachel Carson Associate Professor of Marine Conservation Biology at Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment, who led the new large-scale analysis, said: “Marshes that experienced elevated erosion due to high levels of oiling didn’t recover; they’re now gone, having been converted to mudflats in the shallow underwater environment of the Gulf.”
In the case of marshes where oil covered less than 90 percent of plant stems, the scientists were more optimistic.
“In these marshes, erosion rates did not accelerate, likely reflecting less oil impact,” Silliman said. “So long as the marsh platform elevation is sufficient and the rooting system of the vegetation is healthy and intact, these marshes could potentially recover over time.”
The team’s research is the first empirical study to identify the threshold at which spill-induced marsh erosion occurred across a large geographic area. They used data collected as part of the NRDA, which was conducted by state and federal Natural Resource Trustees in the aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon spill.
The analysis named various sources which estimated that between 60 and 100 linear kilometers of salt marsh experienced plant stem oiling above the 90 percent threshold because of the Deepwater Horizon spill.
Silliman said: “Our analysis reveals that accelerated erosion, and likely land loss, occurred in these areas.”
He noted that most of the erosion occurred within one to two years after the spill. Once the erosion front – created by the black belt of oil that layered over and killed grass on the marsh edge – ran into healthy vegetation farther back, the land loss due to erosion slowed.
This new study corroborates an earlier study led by Silliman that showed elevated erosion at a limited number of heavily oiled sites. These also support studies led by Mark Hester and Jonathan Willis at the University of Louisiana’s Institute for Coastal and Water Research, which found that there was widespread die-back of marsh plants at these sites.
“Given the vital roles coastal salt marshes play in protecting shorelines from erosion and flooding, providing habitat for wildlife and helping clean our water, scientists need to understand the thresholds of salt marsh resilience to human disturbances like oil,” Silliman said.
“By identifying the 90 percent threshold above which spill-induced erosion occurs, our study provides key knowledge to more accurately predict loss of marsh ecosystems following future spills.”