Evergreen’s Bronson Hsieh says Intra-Asia trade may outplace transpacific and Asia-Europe

Bronson Hsieh, Chairman of Evergreen Marine Corporation (Taiwan), today said: “Intra-Asia trade will be the focal point of the container shipping industry in the future.”

He said: “Our company anticipates that the intra-Asia market will continue to benefit from further liberalization of regional trade and the recovery of the global economy. With such growth potential, we believe the intra-Asia trade will continue to grow and its market size will be able to keep pace with the Trans-Pacific trade and the Far East – Europe trade.” Bronson Hsieh is also a Vice Group Chairman of Taiwan’s Evergreen Group.

Speaking in Shenzhen at an industry conference focused on transpacific trades, Mr. Hsieh added that despite the recovery of consumer demand in the US and Europe, the growth of imports from Asia this year can offset the impact of financial storm and return to the pre-crisis levels.

“Boosted by the expansion of China’s domestic market, intra-Asia trade was able to reduce the impact of the economic recession. So, in contrast to the severe decline in most trade lanes, the intra-Asia market maintained a high degree of stability throughout the global financial storm,” said Mr. Hsieh. This year the Asian market has been boosted by regional free trade development and shows strong growth, he added.

Citing statistics, Mr. Hsieh said that in 2009 intra-Asia cargo volumes decreased by 2.6%. During the first half of this year, cargo volumes increased by 16.9%. The performances of both periods have outstripped the long-haul markets from Asia to the US and Europe.
“The change of China’s economic policy offers such an opportunity for ASEAN countries,” said Hsieh. Until the global financial crisis, the booming market triggered a capacity expansion race among vessel owners and container carriers. Quoting published statistics, he said the fleet of VLCS (Very Large Container Ships) is expected to increase to 335 ships with an estimated 200 more expected to join the market by the end of 2013.

“As large-sized newbuilds phase into long-haul services, vessels of middle and smaller sizes will cascade to secondary trade routes. The ripple effect has extended to the intra-Asia market,” he said. ”Previously vessel sizes utilized in the intra-Asia services were limited to about 3,000 TEU due to the capacity of ports and terminals in Southeast Asia. But excluding the Far-East legs of long-haul services, Panamax vessels are being deployed to six intra-Asia loops. With the investment in expansion of terminals in ASEAN countries, the fleet size of ships will continue to increase.”

This year the cargo growth and capacity increases in intra-Asia trades were responsible for port congestion in Vietnam, the Philippines and Indonesia, highlighting the shortage of terminal capacity in these countries. To secure the benefits of free trade agreements, many ASEAN nations are prioritizing the improvement of port facilities and expanded terminal capacity.

“Modern ports are more than gateways for marine transport. They are also an important link in the global supply chain. If terminal capacity does not keep up with increased vessel tonnage, it will negatively impact the efficiency of cargo movements, increase storage costs and raise the uncertainty of logistics management,” said Mr. Hsieh. The result would be a decline in carrier competitiveness and ultimately, plans for investment. “If a country wants to promote foreign trade, therefore, it is imperative that it treats the efficiency of terminal operations as a priority.”

He spoke also of improved rail services, including the modern development of a transportation link that includes the cross-border economic channel starting in Nanning in China and running through major cities in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore by rail and road. The whole network is expected to cover an “astonishing” length of around 5,000 kilometers. In August China and six ASEAN countries reached an agreement on the construction of the Nanning-Singapore Economic Corridor. “The infrastructure project aims to speed up the development of manufacture, agriculture and tourism, and will boost the cargo volumes between China and ASEAN countries. The corridor will substantially reduce the time and cost of transportation to less than half the time,” said Mr. Hsieh.

The second mega-project is the Mekong River rail system. Exactly two months ago ministers from China, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam approved a plan to build the Mekong River rail system during the Greater Mekong Sub-region meeting in Hanoi. They already have the support of Asian Development Bank in the construction of the extensive rail system, which is expected to be completed between the years 2020 to 2025. This project was designed to facilitate cross-border transport and develop closer economic links between these countries.

In summing up, Bronson Hsieh said: “The growth of bilateral trade will boost the cargo volumes of the ocean shipping market as well. These projects have important meanings,” he said. The governments of China and the ASEAN countries have signed the free trade agreement and also actively engaged in improving infrastructure to ensure the success of these ventures. For the under-developed countries of the ASEAN bloc, the lack of infrastructure has always been a crucial factor that hindered industrial development.
“With the implementation of CAFTA (China-ASEAN Free Trade Area), these issues have received the attention of these governments, who are improving the transportation links to facilitate trade flow,” he added.

The tariff reduction between China and six founding members of ASEAN is the first stage of CAFTA. In the next stage, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar will follow suit in five years. China and the four new members of ASEAN will eliminate tariffs on 90% of imported goods by 2015. And we will go from China plus six to China plus ten.

Finally, “the economic growth of ASEAN countries will raise the income of their consumers and increase the demand for the manufactured goods to improve their standard of living,” said Mr. Hsieh. “For China’s export industries, it provides a growth opportunity to make up for slower demand in the US and Europe.”