Conservation Groups Intervene in Denial of Seismic Testing in Atlantic
Conservation groups have moved to intervene in an industry challenge to the federal government’s denial of permits for seismic testing in the Atlantic.
The Southern Environmental Law Center filed motion on behalf of the North Carolina Coastal Federation, the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, One Hundred Miles, and Defenders of Wildlife.
“The only reason to pursue seismic is to drill, and communities all along the Atlantic coast have made clear they don’t want this risky activity off their shores,” said Catherine Wannamaker, senior attorney at the Southern Environmental Law Center. “The federal government recognized that it should not permit the unnecessary harm caused by seismic testing – to important commercial and recreational fisheries and the highly endangered North Atlantic right whale – in a place where drilling has never occurred.”
The federal government denied the seismic permits following its removal of the Atlantic from the 2017-2022 offshore oil and gas leasing program. Applicants for the denied permits challenged that decision in the Department of Interior Board of Land Appeals, an administrative body within the department.
“With a vibrant commercial fishery industry and the only known calving ground for endangered North Atlantic right whales just off our coast, Georgians oppose seismic testing for offshore oil exploration and the risks it poses to our state’s wildlife, wild places, and quality of life,” said Alice Keyes, vice president for coastal conservation at One Hundred Miles. “The decision to deny seismic permits was based on sound science, policy, and public input. One Hundred Miles represents thousands of coastal advocates who stand together to support that decision.”
The Department of the Interior estimates that more than 130,000 marine mammals, including the highly endangered North Atlantic right whale, would be injured by seismic testing along the East Coast.
Seismic blasts also drive away fish, drastically cutting commercial fishing production.
“We oppose seismic surveys that are the first step towards drilling for oil and gas off the coast of North Carolina,” said Todd Miller, executive director of the North Carolina Coastal Federation. “These surveys are too big a risk for whales, dolphin, and fish, and will interfere with commercial and recreational fishing activities for extended periods of time.”
When the federal government included the Southeast Atlantic coast in its initial proposed five-year oil and gas drilling plan, it met widespread and intense opposition by coastal communities and business and political leaders.
More than 120 cities and towns along the Eastern seaboard expressed their opposition, including 100 percent of communities along South Carolina’s coast.
“South Carolina’s coastal communities like Charleston and Beaufort have spoken out for years against seismic testing for oil and gas and drilling because they understand the overwhelming scientific evidence of the risks to marine mammals like the endangered North Atlantic right whale,” said Eddy Moore, energy and climate director at the Coastal Conservation League. “We have already heard from thousands of residents who are prepared to join us in opposing this latest threat to the east coast’s economic and natural well-being.”
After considering impacts to fisheries, the military, local economies, and the environment, as well as the low price of oil, the federal government’s final five-year drilling plan for 2017 – 2022 excluded the Southeast Atlantic.
The administration found that with offshore leasing off the table in the Atlantic for the foreseeable future, seismic testing would cause undue harm, and waiting to allow seismic testing until drilling was imminent would allow technology to advance in ways likely to cause less damage to the marine environment.
The Natural Resources Defense Council and Center for Biological Diversity also moved to intervene in the industry challenge.